![]() ![]() Tuesday missive from Alito appears to be nothing more than Alito’s conclusions about what the ProPublica article was going to look like and why he was going to claim that the story, as he conceived it would be, is wrong - and that, in any event, he had to get out in front of it. On Tuesday, hours after the responses were due, Alito published a Wall Street Journal “ opinion commentary ” - that’s what it’s tagged as, but even the editors in introducing the piece simply call it a “response.” The 6:25 p.m. And, if you’re able to support Law Dork with a paid subscription, truly, thank you for doing so today!īut, that’s exactly what Alito did when ProPublica sent him a series of questions last Friday. If you’re reading this because you clicked a link or got this forwarded to you, please subscribe today. I’m glad that you all support my work, and I hope to get to a point where I’m not focused on subscribers constantly, but, until then, please urge your friends and colleagues to subscribe. While we still haven’t reached the point where Law Dork is sustainable on its own, it’s doing well enough - and I like what I’m able to do here enough - that I’m in for another year. Additionally, I have paid subscribers in 47 states and DC - a true sign of the national scope of Law Dork’s audience.īecause of all of the support that Law Dork has gotten - including the absolutely necessary financial support from many subscribers like you - I am thrilled to be able to continue with Law Dork. That coverage has led to subscribers from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., as well as from more than 100 countries across the globe, according to Substack’s data. Īnd, of course, there is my coverage of the Supreme Court ’s big decisions this year. ![]() ![]() I’m a one-person shop (for now, at least), so there are certainly limits on how much I can cover, but I’ve covered a lot in the first year - including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s start on the Supreme Court, Oklahoma’s foiled plan to execute a man in federal custody, the litigation wave against the new anti-LGBTQ laws and policies, the ongoing fight against mifepristone, and the lawsuit against PrEP coverage that’s exploded into a case against the Affordable Care Act’s preventative care coverage requirements. But, I am grateful to have this platform to cover the stories that I think need to be covered whenever I think that coverage is needed. It has been both complicated and dangerous. The Supreme Court overturned Roe a few days after Law Dork’s launch, leading to a year of fallout, and this year’s legislative sessions have included an unprecedented wave of anti-LGBTQ laws across the nation. Wade and increasing attacks on LGBTQ people, “the coming months could be increasingly complicated at best and dangerous at worst for many people across the country.” As I wrote in my first post here at Law Dork, after referencing the then-likely coming end of Roe v. I am incredibly grateful to the more than 15,000 of you who have subscribed to Law Dork in the first year - including more than 1,000 of you who are supporting my independent legal journalism with a paid subscription. It’s almost unbelievable to me, but Law Dork is one year old today! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |